Is this film more interesting than a documentary of the same actors having lunch?
Meaning of the quote
This quote is asking whether a movie is more interesting than just watching the same actors eat lunch in real life. The idea is that a good movie should be more captivating and provide a more entertaining experience than simply observing the actors' everyday activities. The quote suggests that a well-made film should be able to engage the audience more than a simple, mundane documentary about the actors' personal lives.
About Gene Siskel
Gene Siskel was a renowned American film critic who co-hosted a popular movie review TV series with Roger Ebert. Known for their witty banter and “Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down” ratings system, Siskel and Ebert became icons of American pop culture and influenced the way people consumed and discussed films.
More quotes from Gene Siskel
The result is a picture that represents so much of what I want and rarely get from a movie – a couple of hours filled with characters who are as exciting as the people I know in real life.
American film critic (1946-1999)
We’d rather see a picture that we liked then dump on one we didn’t.
American film critic (1946-1999)
Is this film more interesting than a documentary of the same actors having lunch?
American film critic (1946-1999)
That’s probably when I get the most angry at American movies, when they just so cynically manipulate the audience without even trying to give a good story.
American film critic (1946-1999)
We don’t pretend to disagree.
American film critic (1946-1999)
John Goodman is more that just a big guy, he’s a wonderful actor.
American film critic (1946-1999)
After 27 years, I walked out of my first one a few months ago. Black Sheep with Chris Farley.
American film critic (1946-1999)
The only actor who I think probably might have possibly taken a swing at me if he could have would be Burt Reynolds. He used to call Roger and me the Bruise Brothers, out of Chicago.
American film critic (1946-1999)
But you know, really, if you think about it Roger and I and all critics really have one absolute essential part of our credentials and that is that you believe that that is actually what we think.
American film critic (1946-1999)
I’m not surprised that Spielberg was able to capture the heroism of Schindler; so many of his movies are about the better part of mankind.
American film critic (1946-1999)
In fact, Cannonball Run II. I used to pick that as the worst movie ever made.
American film critic (1946-1999)
They know they got the TV ad, they know they got the name recognition, they know that they can do a tie in with McDonald’s or some fast food outlet and the money is just gonna flow in.
American film critic (1946-1999)